↓ Skip to main content

Randomised trial of standard 2D radiotherapy (RT) versus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients prescribed breast radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Radiotherapy & Oncology, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
408 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomised trial of standard 2D radiotherapy (RT) versus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients prescribed breast radiotherapy
Published in
Radiotherapy & Oncology, January 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.12.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Donovan, Natalie Bleakley, Erica Denholm, Phil Evans, Lone Gothard, Jane Hanson, Clare Peckitt, Stephanie Reise, Gill Ross, Grace Sharp, Richard Symonds-Tayler, Diana Tait, John Yarnold, on behalf of the Breast Technology Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 177 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Postgraduate 21 12%
Other 20 11%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 44%
Physics and Astronomy 22 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,760,834
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#1,227
of 4,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,077
of 172,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.