↓ Skip to main content

Disinformation: The Use of False Information

Overview of attention for article published in Minds and Machines, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Disinformation: The Use of False Information
Published in
Minds and Machines, May 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:mind.0000021683.28604.5b
Authors

James H. Fetzer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 169 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 13 7%
Librarian 6 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 58 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 54 31%
Computer Science 19 11%
Philosophy 9 5%
Psychology 9 5%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 58 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#151
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,973
of 62,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.