↓ Skip to main content

Asymmetries in Benefiting, Harming and Creating

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Ethics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Asymmetries in Benefiting, Harming and Creating
Published in
The Journal of Ethics, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10892-012-9134-6
Authors

Ben Bradley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 13 72%
Arts and Humanities 3 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Ethics
#72
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,110
of 170,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Ethics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.