↓ Skip to main content

Bioengineering virus‐like particles as vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology & Bioengineering, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
496 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioengineering virus‐like particles as vaccines
Published in
Biotechnology & Bioengineering, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/bit.25159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda H.L. Lua, Natalie K. Connors, Frank Sainsbury, Yap P. Chuan, Nani Wibowo, Anton P.J. Middelberg

Abstract

Virus-like particle (VLP) technology seeks to harness the optimally tuned immunostimulatory properties of natural viruses while omitting the infectious trait. VLPs that assemble from a single protein have been shown to be safe and highly efficacious in humans, and highly profitable. VLPs emerging from basic research possess varying levels of complexity and comprise single or multiple proteins, with or without a lipid membrane. Complex VLP assembly is traditionally orchestrated within cells using black-box approaches, which are appropriate when knowledge and control over assembly are limited. Recovery challenges including those of adherent and intracellular contaminants must then be addressed. Recent commercial VLPs variously incorporate steps that include VLP in vitro assembly to address these problems robustly, but at the expense of process complexity. Increasing research activity and translation opportunity necessitate bioengineering advances and new bioprocessing modalities for efficient and cost-effective production of VLPs. Emerging approaches are necessarily multi-scale and multi-disciplinary, encompassing diverse fields from computational design of molecules to new macro-scale purification materials. In this review, we highlight historical and emerging VLP vaccine approaches. We overview approaches that seek to specifically engineer a desirable immune response through modular VLP design, and those that seek to improve bioprocess efficiency through inhibition of intracellular assembly to allow optimal use of existing purification technologies prior to cell-free VLP assembly. Greater understanding of VLP assembly and increased interdisciplinary activity will see enormous progress in VLP technology over the coming decade, driven by clear translational opportunity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 483 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 17%
Researcher 64 13%
Student > Bachelor 63 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 106 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 109 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 21%
Engineering 43 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 5%
Chemistry 22 4%
Other 75 15%
Unknown 116 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,625,813
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology & Bioengineering
#467
of 6,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,834
of 307,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology & Bioengineering
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.