↓ Skip to main content

Asymmetric Synthesis of Secondary and Tertiary Boronic Esters

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Asymmetric Synthesis of Secondary and Tertiary Boronic Esters
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/anie.201701963
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beatrice S. L. Collins, Claire M. Wilson, Eddie L. Myers, Varinder K. Aggarwal

Abstract

Non-racemic chiral boronic esters are recognised as immensely valuable building blocks in modern organic synthesis. Their stereospecific transformation into a variety of functional group - from amines and halides to arenes and alkynes - along with their air and moisture stability, has established them as an important target for asymmetric synthesis. Efforts towards the stereoselective synthesis of secondary and tertiary alkyl boronic esters have spanned over five decades and are underpinned by a wealth of reactivity platforms, drawing on the unique and varied reactivity of boron. This review summarizes strategies for the asymmetric synthesis of alkyl boronic esters, from the seminal hydroboration methods of H. C. Brown to the current state of the art.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 28%
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 84 77%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 <1%
Materials Science 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,254,232
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#5,093
of 50,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,144
of 327,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#153
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.