Title |
Mutations in the EGF-CFC Gene Cryptic Are an Infrequent Cause of Congenital Heart Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pediatric Cardiology, October 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00246-006-1082-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cemil Özcelik, Nana Bit-Avragim, Anna Panek, Ursula Gaio, Christian Geier, Peter E. Lange, Rainer Dietz, Maximilian G. Posch, Andreas Perrot, Brigitte Stiller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#277
of 1,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,964
of 68,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,412 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them