↓ Skip to main content

A guide to assessing physical activity using accelerometry in cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
A guide to assessing physical activity using accelerometry in cancer patients
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00520-013-2102-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. M. Broderick, J. Ryan, D. M. O’Donnell, J. Hussey

Abstract

Increased physical activity (PA) has been associated with a decreased risk for the occurrence and recurrence of many cancers. PA is an important outcome measure in rehabilitation interventions within cancer and may be used as a proxy measure of recovery or deterioration in health status following treatment and in the palliative care setting. PA is a complex multi-dimensional construct which is challenging to measure accurately. Factors such as technical precision and feasibility influence the choice of PA measurement tool. Laboratory-based methods are precise and mainly used for validation purposes, but their clinical applicability is limited. Self-report methods such as questionnaires are widely used due to their simplicity and reasonable cost; however, accuracy can be questionable. Objective methods such as pedometers measure step count but do not measure intensity, frequency or duration of activity. Accelerometers can measure PA behaviour at both ends of the movement spectrum from sedentary to vigorous levels of activity and can also provide objective data about the frequency, intensity, type and duration of PA. Balancing precision with ease of use, accelerometry may be the best measure of PA in cancer-based studies, but only a small number of studies have incorporated this measurement. This review will provide a background to PA and an overview of accelerometer measurement as well as technical and practical considerations, so this useful tool could be more widely incorporated into clinical trial research within cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 189 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Student > Master 35 18%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 26%
Sports and Recreations 31 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Engineering 13 7%
Computer Science 9 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 40 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,316,839
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,503
of 4,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,094
of 304,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#14
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.