You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isolation of Clostridium tetani from an intracorporeal foreign body in a patient with clinical tetanus receiving antibiotics: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3918/jsicm.23.167 |
| Authors |
Yu Hiramatsu, Keisuke Yano, Kazuki Yutsudou, Dai Imanaka, Go Tsukuya, Masaru Yonezawa, Nami Ueya, Yasuyuki Kakihana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,361,747
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,703
of 401,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.