↓ Skip to main content

What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Business Studies, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research
Published in
Journal of International Business Studies, May 2017
DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0078-8
Authors

Klaus E Meyer, Arjen van Witteloostuijn, Sjoerd Beugelsdijk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 337 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 20%
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 7%
Researcher 21 6%
Other 65 19%
Unknown 82 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 135 40%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23 7%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Psychology 12 4%
Engineering 10 3%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 102 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,219,689
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Business Studies
#69
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,857
of 318,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Business Studies
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.