↓ Skip to main content

The Flexibility Scale: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Cognitive Flexibility Measure in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
The Flexibility Scale: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Cognitive Flexibility Measure in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3152-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

John F. Strang, Laura G. Anthony, Benjamin E. Yerys, Kristina K. Hardy, Gregory L. Wallace, Anna C. Armour, Katerina Dudley, Lauren Kenworthy

Abstract

Flexibility is a key component of executive function, and is related to everyday functioning and adult outcomes. However, existing informant reports do not densely sample cognitive aspects of flexibility; the Flexibility Scale (FS) was developed to address this gap. This study investigates the validity of the FS in 221 youth with ASD and 57 typically developing children. Exploratory factor analysis indicates a five-factor scale: Routines/rituals, transitions/change, special interests, social flexibility, and generativity. The FS demonstrated convergent and divergent validity with comparative domains of function in other measures, save for the Generativity factor. The FS discriminated participants with ASD and controls. Thus, this study suggests the FS may be a viable, comprehensive measure of flexibility in everyday settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 192 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 51 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 38%
Neuroscience 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 62 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,850,891
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,232
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,507
of 327,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#30
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.