↓ Skip to main content

Mediating Effects of Social Support on Quality of Life for Parents of Adults with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Mediating Effects of Social Support on Quality of Life for Parents of Adults with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3157-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina N. Marsack, Preethy S. Samuel

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the mediating effect of formal and informal social support on the relationship of caregiver burden and quality of life (QOL), using a sample of 320 parents (aged 50 or older) of adult children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Multiple linear regression and mediation analyses indicated that caregiver burden had a negative impact on QOL and that informal social support partially mediated the relationship between caregiver burden and parents' QOL. Formal social support did not mediate the relationship between caregiver burden and QOL. The findings underscored the need to support aging parents of adult children with ASD through enhancing their informal social support networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 69 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 76 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,934,231
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#797
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,799
of 327,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#21
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.