↓ Skip to main content

Intraindividual variation in urinary iodine concentrations: effect of adjustment on population distribution using two and three repeated spot urine collections

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraindividual variation in urinary iodine concentrations: effect of adjustment on population distribution using two and three repeated spot urine collections
Published in
BMJ Open, January 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen E Charlton, Marijka J Batterham, Li Min Buchanan, Dorothy Mackerras

Abstract

To determine the effect of adjustment for intraindividual variation on estimations of urinary iodine concentrations (UIC), prevalence of iodine deficiency and population distribution of iodine status.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,351,826
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#16,258
of 25,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,382
of 320,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#183
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.