↓ Skip to main content

Immunobiology of the Critical Asthma Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Immunobiology of the Critical Asthma Syndrome
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12016-013-8407-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richart W. Harper, Amir A. Zeki

Abstract

It is now recognized that asthma incorporates a broad spectrum of syndromes with varying clinical manifestations. Future improvements in asthma treatment will require a clear characterization of these asthma phenotypes and the cellular mechanisms underlying these clinical manifestations. Herein, we will describe the current knowledge of asthma biology. This will include a review of the early pioneers in asthma and allergy, how this work led to our understanding of TH1 and TH2 cytokines, and the development of the "hygiene hypothesis." We will discuss the utility and limitations of the TH1-TH2 model of asthma in animal and human studies, and how this knowledge addresses controversies surrounding the hygiene hypothesis and other competing models. We will discuss novel therapies that have been developed based on mechanistic understanding of asthma pathobiology, including successes and shortcomings of these therapies. We will review the early work that led to the recognition of "asthma phenotypes." This will include the early discovery of various inflammatory subtypes in asthma and how these inflammatory subtypes correlate with response to therapy. Finally, we will describe recent discoveries in asthma biology that will include the role of the airway epithelium in asthma pathogenesis, novel cytokines important in asthma that may serve as novel therapeutic targets, and the identification of newly described innate immune cells and their role in asthma. Improved understanding of the complex biology underpinning the various asthma phenotypes is critical for our ability to optimize treatment for all patients that suffer from asthma and critical asthma syndromes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,722,312
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#437
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,668
of 312,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.