| Title |
Risk of developing metachronous colon neoplasm after polypectomy: comparison of one-stage versus two-stage polypectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3363-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Soo-Kyung Park, Jong Wook Kim, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Kee Wook Jung, Kyung Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon |
| Abstract |
The impact of one-stage polypectomy (removal of all neoplasms during diagnostic colonoscopy) versus two-stage polypectomy (removal of all neoplasms during therapeutic colonoscopy following the initial diagnostic colonoscopy) on the development of metachronous neoplasms is poorly understood. Our aim was to compare the effects of one- versus two-stage polypectomy on the development of metachronous neoplasms |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 63% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,290,667
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,781
of 6,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,399
of 304,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#70
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.