↓ Skip to main content

Flavored Anesthetic Masks for Inhalational Induction in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Flavored Anesthetic Masks for Inhalational Induction in Children
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12098-017-2368-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aakriti Gupta, Preethy Joseph Mathew, Neerja Bhardwaj

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of masking the odor of inhalational agents using fruit flavors on the anxiety behavior and compliance of children for inhalational induction. A prospective randomized double blind, placebo controlled study was conducted on 60 unpremedicated children in the age group of 4-12 y. Thirty children received anesthetic masks smeared with a flavor of child's choice while the other 30 children were induced using masks without flavor. Anxiety was assessed using modified Yale Pre-operative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) in the pre-op room and during inhalational induction. Mask acceptance was graded by Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC). The cost-effectiveness of flavored anesthetic masks was compared to that of commercially available pre-scented masks. The baseline anxiety in the two groups was comparable. The number of children demonstrating high levels of anxiety at anesthetic induction was similar in flavored and non-flavored mask groups (p 0.45). The compliance to mask induction was also equally good (p 0.99). The authors found significant difference in the cost of flavored mask (INR 56.45 per mask) as compared to commercially available pre-scented masks (INR 660 per mask). The authors observed a placebo effect that reduced the pre-op anxiety in the control group which probably made the quality of induction equivalent with flavored and non-flavored masks. Therefore, using a flavored anesthetic mask is cost-effective than using a commercially available pre-scented mask.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 33%