↓ Skip to main content

Comparisons of agricultural productivity growth in China and India

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Productivity Analysis, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 188)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Comparisons of agricultural productivity growth in China and India
Published in
Journal of Productivity Analysis, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11123-009-0156-4
Authors

Alejandro Nin-Pratt, Bingxin Yu, Shenggen Fan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
India 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 37%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,276,796
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Productivity Analysis
#45
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,864
of 96,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Productivity Analysis
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.