↓ Skip to main content

S-Nitrosylation Regulates Cell Survival and Death in the Central Nervous System

Overview of attention for article published in Neurochemical Research, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
S-Nitrosylation Regulates Cell Survival and Death in the Central Nervous System
Published in
Neurochemical Research, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11064-017-2303-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshiki Koriyama, Ayako Furukawa

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO), which is produced from nitric oxide synthase, is an important cell signaling molecule that is crucial for many physiological functions such as neuronal death, neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and vascular homeostasis. This diffusible gaseous compound functions as an effector or second messenger in many intercellular communications and/or cell signaling pathways. Protein S-nitrosylation is a posttranslational modification that involves the covalent attachment of an NO group to the thiol side chain of select cysteine residues on target proteins. This process is thought to be very important for the regulation of cell death, cell survival, and gene expression in the central nervous system (CNS). However, there have been few reports on the role of protein S-nitrosylation in CNS disorders. Here, we briefly review specific examples of S-nitrosylation, with particular emphasis on its functions in neuronal cell death and survival. An understanding of the role and mechanisms underlying the effects of protein S-nitrosylation on neurodegenerative/neuroprotective events may reveal a novel therapeutic strategy for rescuing neurons in neurodegenerative diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Neuroscience 4 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2017.
All research outputs
#14,936,169
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#1,235
of 2,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,482
of 442,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.