| Title |
Use of anthropogenic material affects bird nest arthropod community structure: influence of urbanisation, and consequences for ectoparasites and fledging success
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-017-1462-7 |
| Authors |
Hugh J. Hanmer, Rebecca L. Thomas, Gareth J. F. Beswick, Bradley P. Collins, Mark D. E. Fellowes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 21% |
| Japan | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 53% |
| Scientists | 18 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#804,292
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#39
of 1,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,299
of 330,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.