You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the efficiency of environmental monitoring programs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Indicators, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.010 |
| Authors |
Carrie R. Levine, Ruth D. Yanai, Gregory G. Lampman, Douglas A. Burns, Charles T. Driscoll, Gregory B. Lawrence, Jason A. Lynch, Nina Schoch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 85 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,563,090
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#2,371
of 3,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,892
of 241,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.