↓ Skip to main content

Edible bird’s nest: Food or medicine?

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Edible bird’s nest: Food or medicine?
Published in
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11655-013-1563-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca S. Y. Wong

Abstract

Edible bird's nest (EBN) is derived from the saliva of certain types of swiftlets. It is consumed in many parts of the world for its nutritional and medicinal values. Although many claims have been made on the therapeutic and health-promoting effects of EBN, scientific documentations regarding these effects are very limited in published literature. It is not until recently that the biological effects of EBN are being investigated and evidence-based studies are being conducted. Several studies have found that EBN may enhance cell proliferation and differentiation and various beneficial effects have been reported in vitro as well as in vivo. While these studies point towards the potential use of EBN in the treatment or even prevention of several diseases, the mechanisms of action of EBN remain largely unknown and more explorations are needed. This review is one of the very few scientific reviews on EBN which focuses on recent evidence-based discoveries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 20%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Lecturer 3 3%
Researcher 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 41 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 17%
Engineering 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 45 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,423,456
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#103
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,062
of 199,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.