↓ Skip to main content

Environmental exposure and mitochondrial epigenetics: study design and analytical challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Environmental exposure and mitochondrial epigenetics: study design and analytical challenges
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00439-013-1417-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyang-Min Byun, Andrea A. Baccarelli

Abstract

The environment can influence human health and disease in many harmful ways. Many epidemiological studies have been conducted with the aim of elucidating the association between environmental exposure and human disease at the molecular and pathological levels, and such associations can often be through induced epigenetic changes. One such mechanism for this is through environmental factors increasing oxidative stress in the cell, and this stress can subsequently lead to alterations in DNA molecules. The two cellular organelles that contain DNA are the nucleus and mitochondria, and the latter are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress, with mitochondrial functions often disrupted by increased stress. There has been a substantial increase over the past decade in the number of epigenetic studies investigating the impact of environmental exposures upon genomic DNA, but to date there has been insufficient attention paid to the impact upon mitochondrial epigenetics in studying human disease with exposure to environment. Here, in this review, we will discuss mitochondrial epigenetics with regard to epidemiological studies, with particular consideration given to study design and analytical challenges. Furthermore, we suggest future directions and perspectives in the field of mitochondrial epigenetic epidemiological studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 24%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,537
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#886
of 2,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,551
of 320,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#18
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.