You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hypnotherapy is more effective than nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: Results of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.12.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Faysal M. Hasan, Sofija E. Zagarins, Karen M. Pischke, Shamila Saiyed, Ann Marie Bettencourt, Laura Beal, Diane Macys, Sanjay Aurora, Nancy McCleary |
| Abstract |
The efficacy of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation is well documented. However, due to relapse rates and side effects, hypnotherapy is gaining attention as an alternative treatment option. The aim of this one-center randomized study was to compare the efficacy of hypnotherapy alone, as well as hypnotherapy with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), to conventional NRT in patients hospitalized with a cardiac or pulmonary illness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 41% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Namibia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 30% |
| Psychology | 27 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 790. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#24,536
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Complementary Therapies in Medicine
#1
of 1,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160
of 320,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complementary Therapies in Medicine
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.