↓ Skip to main content

Stress and decision making: neural correlates of the interaction between stress, executive functions, and decision making under risk

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
Title
Stress and decision making: neural correlates of the interaction between stress, executive functions, and decision making under risk
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00221-013-3808-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina Gathmann, Frank P. Schulte, Stefan Maderwald, Mirko Pawlikowski, Katrin Starcke, Lena C. Schäfer, Tobias Schöler, Oliver T. Wolf, Matthias Brand

Abstract

Stress and additional load on the executive system, produced by a parallel working memory task, impair decision making under risk. However, the combination of stress and a parallel task seems to preserve the decision-making performance [e.g., operationalized by the Game of Dice Task (GDT)] from decreasing, probably by a switch from serial to parallel processing. The question remains how the brain manages such demanding decision-making situations. The current study used a 7-tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system in order to investigate the underlying neural correlates of the interaction between stress (induced by the Trier Social Stress Test), risky decision making (GDT), and a parallel executive task (2-back task) to get a better understanding of those behavioral findings. The results show that on a behavioral level, stressed participants did not show significant differences in task performance. Interestingly, when comparing the stress group (SG) with the control group, the SG showed a greater increase in neural activation in the anterior prefrontal cortex when performing the 2-back task simultaneously with the GDT than when performing each task alone. This brain area is associated with parallel processing. Thus, the results may suggest that in stressful dual-tasking situations, where a decision has to be made when in parallel working memory is demanded, a stronger activation of a brain area associated with parallel processing takes place. The findings are in line with the idea that stress seems to trigger a switch from serial to parallel processing in demanding dual-tasking situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 244 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 22%
Student > Master 40 16%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 45 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 97 38%
Neuroscience 26 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 54 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,357,566
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#86
of 3,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,497
of 304,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.