Title |
Novel Microhydroxyapatite Particles in a Collagen Scaffold: A Bioactive Bone Void Filler?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3438-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frank G. Lyons, John P. Gleeson, Sonia Partap, Karen Coghlan, Fergal J. O'Brien |
Abstract |
Treatment of segmental bone loss remains a major challenge in orthopaedic surgery. Traditional techniques (eg, autograft) and newer techniques (eg, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 [rhBMP-2]) have well-established performance limitations and safety concerns respectively. Consequently there is an unmet need for osteoinductive bone graft substitutes that may eliminate or reduce the use of rhBMP-2. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 105 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 26% |
Researcher | 19 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 22% |
Engineering | 17 | 16% |
Materials Science | 12 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2014.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,161
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,430
of 318,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#41
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.