↓ Skip to main content

Novel Microhydroxyapatite Particles in a Collagen Scaffold: A Bioactive Bone Void Filler?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Novel Microhydroxyapatite Particles in a Collagen Scaffold: A Bioactive Bone Void Filler?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3438-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank G. Lyons, John P. Gleeson, Sonia Partap, Karen Coghlan, Fergal J. O'Brien

Abstract

Treatment of segmental bone loss remains a major challenge in orthopaedic surgery. Traditional techniques (eg, autograft) and newer techniques (eg, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 [rhBMP-2]) have well-established performance limitations and safety concerns respectively. Consequently there is an unmet need for osteoinductive bone graft substitutes that may eliminate or reduce the use of rhBMP-2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Engineering 17 16%
Materials Science 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2014.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,161
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,430
of 318,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#41
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.