↓ Skip to main content

ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update
Published in
European Radiology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00330-016-4600-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosemarie Forstner, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Teresa Margarida Cunha, Karen Kinkel, Gabriele Masselli, Rahel Kubik-Huch, John A. Spencer, Andrea Rockall

Abstract

An update of the 2010 published ESUR recommendations of MRI of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass integrating functional techniques is provided. An algorithmic approach using sagittal T2 and a set of transaxial T1 and T2WI allows categorization of adnexal masses in one of the following three types according to its predominant signal characteristics. T1 'bright' masses due to fat or blood content can be simply and effectively determined using a combination of T1W, T2W and FST1W imaging. When there is concern for a solid component within such a mass, it requires additional assessment as for a complex cystic or cystic-solid mass. For low T2 solid adnexal masses, DWI is now recommended. Such masses with low DWI signal on high b value image (e.g. > b 1000 s/mm(2)) can be regarded as benign. Any other solid adnexal mass, displaying intermediate or high DWI signal, requires further assessment by contrast-enhanced (CE)T1W imaging, ideally with DCE MR, where a type 3 curve is highly predictive of malignancy. For complex cystic or cystic-solid masses, both DWI and CET1W-preferably DCE MRI-is recommended. Characteristic enhancement curves of solid components can discriminate between lesions that are highly likely malignant and highly likely benign. • MRI is a useful complementary imaging technique for assessing sonographically indeterminate masses. • Categorization allows confident diagnosis in the majority of adnexal masses. • Type 3 contrast enhancement curve is a strong indicator of malignancy. • In sonographically indeterminate masses, complementary MRI assists in triaging patient management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Other 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 42 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 48 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,346,585
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,188
of 4,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,218
of 316,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#21
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.