↓ Skip to main content

Factors Shaping Workplace Segregation Between Natives and Immigrants

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Factors Shaping Workplace Segregation Between Natives and Immigrants
Published in
Demography, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13524-013-0271-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magnus Strömgren, Tiit Tammaru, Alexander M. Danzer, Maarten van Ham, Szymon Marcińczak, Olof Stjernström, Urban Lindgren

Abstract

Research on segregation of immigrant groups is increasingly turning its attention from residential areas toward other important places, such as the workplace, where immigrants can meet and interact with members of the native population. This article examines workplace segregation of immigrants. We use longitudinal, georeferenced Swedish population register data, which enables us to observe all immigrants in Sweden for the period 1990-2005 on an annual basis. We compare estimates from ordinary least squares with fixed-effects regressions to quantify the extent of immigrants' self-selection into specific workplaces, neighborhoods, and partnerships, which may bias more naïve ordinary least squares results. In line with previous research, we find lower levels of workplace segregation than residential segregation. The main finding is that low levels of residential segregation reduce workplace segregation, even after we take into account intermarriage with natives as well as unobserved characteristics of immigrants' such as willingness and ability to integrate into the host society. Being intermarried with a native reduces workplace segregation for immigrant men but not for immigrant women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 29%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 41 44%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2014.
All research outputs
#18,360,179
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#1,796
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,693
of 304,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.