↓ Skip to main content

Incisional Hernia: Open Techniques

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Incisional Hernia: Open Techniques
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00268-005-7970-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uwe Klinge, Joachim Conze, Carsten J. Krones, Volker Schumpelick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,459,782
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,057
of 4,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,117
of 56,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.