| Title |
Does Extracapsular Extension Impact the Prognosis of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-013-3447-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathalie Chéreau, Camille Buffet, Christophe Trésallet, Frederique Tissier, Jean-Louis Golmard, Laurence Leenhardt, Fabrice Menegaux |
| Abstract |
Extracapsular (EC) extension is a pejorative factor in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). However, the impact of EC extension in microcarcinoma (micro-pT3) remains controversial, and all pT3 patients are currently considered to be at high risk of recurrence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 30% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,360,179
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,968
of 6,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,637
of 304,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#44
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.