↓ Skip to main content

Additive homeopathy in cancer patients: Retrospective survival data from a homeopathic outpatient unit at the Medical University of Vienna

Overview of attention for article published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
49 X users
facebook
59 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Additive homeopathy in cancer patients: Retrospective survival data from a homeopathic outpatient unit at the Medical University of Vienna
Published in
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.12.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Gaertner, Michael Müllner, Helmut Friehs, Ernst Schuster, Christine Marosi, Ilse Muchitsch, Michael Frass, Alan David Kaye

Abstract

Current literature suggests a positive influence of additive classical homeopathy on global health and well-being in cancer patients. Besides encouraging case reports, there is little if any research on long-term survival of patients who obtain homeopathic care during cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#716,456
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Complementary Therapies in Medicine
#106
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,415
of 318,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complementary Therapies in Medicine
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.