You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
病院外心停止症例におけるアドレナリン投与の脳機能予後に対する効果(第一報)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.11240/jsem.19.578 |
| Authors |
植田 広樹, 田中 秀治, 田久 浩志, 匂坂 量, 白川 透, 後藤 奏, 島崎 修次 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 35% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,081,607
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#7
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,926
of 381,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them