↓ Skip to main content

Why voters do not throw the rascals out?— A conceptual framework for analysing electoral punishment of corruption

Overview of attention for article published in Crime, Law and Social Change, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Why voters do not throw the rascals out?— A conceptual framework for analysing electoral punishment of corruption
Published in
Crime, Law and Social Change, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10611-013-9483-5
Authors

Luís de Sousa, Marcelo Moriconi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 49%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 10%
Psychology 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2014.
All research outputs
#16,172,769
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Crime, Law and Social Change
#458
of 698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,753
of 206,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crime, Law and Social Change
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.