↓ Skip to main content

Three hundred years of Taungya: A sustainable system of forestry in south China

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, December 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Three hundred years of Taungya: A sustainable system of forestry in south China
Published in
Human Ecology, December 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00891648
Authors

Nicholas Menzies

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 32%
Environmental Science 11 19%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,031,241
of 23,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#222
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,961
of 55,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them