↓ Skip to main content

Post-Boom Logging in Amazonia

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Post-Boom Logging in Amazonia
Published in
Human Ecology, June 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011064031078
Authors

Miguel Pinedo-Vasquez, Daniel J. Zarin, Kevin Coffey, Christine Padoch, Fernando Rabelo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 86 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 27%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 25%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,863,909
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#124
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,609
of 41,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them