↓ Skip to main content

Growth of the queen conch Strombus gigas, with a discussion of the practicality of its mariculture

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, February 1976
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Growth of the queen conch Strombus gigas, with a discussion of the practicality of its mariculture
Published in
Marine Biology, February 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf00388795
Authors

C. J. Berg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 25%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 57%
Environmental Science 5 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,241
of 3,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,275
of 21,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.