↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of rare variant population structure in Europeans explains differential stratification of gene-based tests

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of rare variant population structure in Europeans explains differential stratification of gene-based tests
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2013.297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Zawistowski, Mark Reppell, Daniel Wegmann, Pamela L St Jean, Margaret G Ehm, Matthew R Nelson, John Novembre, Sebastian Zöllner

Abstract

There is substantial interest in the role of rare genetic variants in the etiology of complex human diseases. Several gene-based tests have been developed to simultaneously analyze multiple rare variants for association with phenotypic traits. The tests can largely be partitioned into two classes - 'burden' tests and 'joint' tests - based on how they accumulate evidence of association across sites. We used the empirical joint site frequency spectra of rare, nonsynonymous variation from a large multi-population sequencing study to explore the effect of realistic rare variant population structure on gene-based tests. We observed an important difference between the two test classes: their susceptibility to population stratification. Focusing on European samples, we found that joint tests, which allow variants to have opposite directions of effect, consistently showed higher levels of P-value inflation than burden tests. We determined that the differential stratification was caused by two specific patterns in the interpopulation distribution of rare variants, each correlating with inflation in one of the test classes. The pattern that inflates joint tests is more prevalent in real data, explaining the higher levels of inflation in these tests. Furthermore, we show that the different sources of inflation between tests lead to heterogeneous responses to genomic control correction and the number of variants analyzed. Our results indicate that care must be taken when interpreting joint and burden analyses of the same set of rare variants, in particular, to avoid mistaking inflated P-values in joint tests for stronger signals of true associations.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 8 January 2014; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.297.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 33%
Researcher 21 33%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Computer Science 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 2 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#13,400,446
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#2,564
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,563
of 304,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#28
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.