| Title |
The impact of disability in survivors of critical illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-017-4830-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol L. Hodgson, Andrew A. Udy, Michael Bailey, Jonathan Barrett, Rinaldo Bellomo, Tracey Bucknall, Belinda J. Gabbe, Alisa M. Higgins, Theodore J. Iwashyna, Julian Hunt-Smith, Lynne J. Murray, Paul S. Myles, Jennie Ponsford, David Pilcher, Craig Walker, Meredith Young, D. J. Cooper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 24% |
| Australia | 11 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 50% |
| Scientists | 13 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 19% |
| Unknown | 77 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 83 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,256,095
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,133
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,273
of 331,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#18
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.