| Title |
The efficacy of probiotics for monosodium glutamate-induced obesity: dietology concerns and opportunities for prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EPMA Journal, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1878-5085-5-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oleksandr A Savcheniuk, Oleksandr V Virchenko, Tetyana M Falalyeyeva, Tetyana V Beregova, Lidia P Babenko, Liudmyla M Lazarenko, Olga M Demchenko, Rostyslav V Bubnov, Mykola Ya Spivak |
| Abstract |
Obesity becomes endemic today. Monosodium glutamate was proved as obesogenic food additive. Probiotics are discussed to impact on obesity development. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,819,412
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from EPMA Journal
#148
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,912
of 314,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPMA Journal
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.