| Title |
Traditional medicine as a potential treatment for Flammer syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EPMA Journal, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13167-017-0091-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akiko Kikuchi, Yukihiro Shiga, Shin Takayama, Ryutaro Arita, Shigeto Maekawa, Soichiro Kaneko, Noriko Himori, Tadashi Ishii, Toru Nakazawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#21,498,958
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from EPMA Journal
#278
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,959
of 313,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPMA Journal
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.