↓ Skip to main content

The open-object illusion: size perception is greatly influenced by object boundaries

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
The open-object illusion: size perception is greatly influenced by object boundaries
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, May 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13414-017-1326-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tal Makovski

Abstract

This study presents a new powerful visual illusion, in which simple "open" objects-ones with missing boundaries-are perceived as bigger than the same size, fully "closed" objects. In a series of experiments that employed a continuous-response adjustment procedure, it was found that the lack of vertical boundaries inflated the perceived width of an object, whereas the lack of horizontal boundaries inflated its perceived length. The effect was highly robust and it was replicated across different stimulus types and experimental parameters, with almost all observers exhibiting a strong effect. In contrast to the overestimation of the size of an object due to missing boundaries, the inclusion of inner boundaries within an object caused observers to underestimate its size, suggesting that filled space sometimes shrinks, rather than inflates, the perceived size of an object. The open-object illusion bears practical implications for graphics and design as well as important theoretical implications. Specifically, it indicates that the perception of an object's area is not veridical but rather critically depends on contour closure. It is suggested that the visual system extends the missing boundaries of open contour objects, which results in an overestimation of the object's size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#16,665,631
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#861
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,236
of 315,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.