Title |
Government capacities and stakeholders: what facilitates ehealth legislation?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Globalization and Health, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1744-8603-10-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Achim Lang |
Abstract |
Newly established high-technology areas such as eHealth require regulations regarding the interoperability of health information infrastructures and data protection. It is argued that government capacities as well as the extent to which public and private organizations participate in policy-making determine the level of eHealth legislation. Both explanatory factors are influenced by international organizations that provide knowledge transfer and encourage private actor participation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 17% |
Computer Science | 13 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 20% |
Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,738,224
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#1,006
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,451
of 320,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.