↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive Multi-scale Sampling to Determine an Invasive Crab’s Habitat Usage and Range in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Adaptive Multi-scale Sampling to Determine an Invasive Crab’s Habitat Usage and Range in New Zealand
Published in
Biological Invasions, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10530-004-8243-y
Authors

Nick Gust, Graeme J. Inglis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 3%
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 53 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 28%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 67%
Environmental Science 11 18%
Psychology 1 2%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,188
of 2,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,887
of 72,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.