Title |
Get Screened: A Randomized Trial of the Incremental Benefits of Reminders, Recall, and Outreach on Cancer Screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2586-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert J. Fortuna, Amna Idris, Paul Winters, Sharon G. Humiston, Steven Scofield, Samantha Hendren, Patricia Ford, Shirley X. L. Li, Kevin Fiscella |
Abstract |
Rates of breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are particularly low among poor and minority patients. Multifaceted interventions have been shown to improve cancer-screening rates, yet the relative impact of the specific components of these interventions has not been assessed. Identifying the specific components necessary to improve cancer-screening rates is critical to tailor interventions in resource limited environments. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 101 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 22% |
Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 29% |
Psychology | 15 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,070,296
of 24,208,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,428
of 7,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,855
of 201,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#30
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,208,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.