↓ Skip to main content

Residual effects of eszopiclone and placebo in healthy elderly subjects: a randomized double-blind study

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Biological Rhythms, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Residual effects of eszopiclone and placebo in healthy elderly subjects: a randomized double-blind study
Published in
Sleep and Biological Rhythms, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s41105-017-0101-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Takahashi, Takashi Kanbayashi, Sachiko Ito Uemura, Youhei Sagawa, Kou Tsutsui, Yuya Takahashi, Yuki Omori, Aya Imanishi, Masahiro Takeshima, Masahiro Satake, Tetsuo Shimizu

Abstract

Next-day residual effects are a common problem with current hypnotics. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the residual effects of eszopiclone on the physical and cognitive functions of healthy elderly people in the early morning and the day following drug administration. Four men and six women aged 63-72 years were administered eszopiclone 1 mg or placebo in a randomized, double-blind and crossover design. Measures of objective parameters and subjective ratings were obtained at 4:00, 6:00, and every 2 h from 6:00 to 16:00 hours. For the timed up-and-go test, the main effects of time were seen. For the critical flicker fusion, eszopiclone had significantly worse results compared to placebo in early morning (4:00). There were no significant differences between eszopiclone and placebo in other objective assessments. For the sleep latency, eszopiclone had significantly shorter results compared to placebo (eszopiclone vs placebo = 28.4 vs 52.5 min, p = 0.047). Feeling of deep sleep and the number of wake after sleep onset did not show any significant differences between eszopiclone and placebo. Based on the above results, the changes of physical and cognitive functions in the healthy elderly after taking hypnotics, it was found that eszopiclone 1 mg is likely to be unharmful for the healthy elderly. Further studies of elderly insomniacs with midnight awakenings are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 10 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,291,311
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Biological Rhythms
#153
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,323
of 315,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Biological Rhythms
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.