↓ Skip to main content

Vintage venoms: Proteomic and pharmacological stability of snake venoms stored for up to eight decades

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Proteomics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 3,461)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vintage venoms: Proteomic and pharmacological stability of snake venoms stored for up to eight decades
Published in
Journal of Proteomics, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.01.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clémence Jesupret, Kate Baumann, Timothy N.W. Jackson, Syed Abid Ali, Daryl C. Yang, Laura Greisman, Larissa Kern, Jessica Steuten, Mahdokht Jouiaei, Nicholas R. Casewell, Eivind A.B. Undheim, Ivan Koludarov, Jordan Debono, Dolyce H.W. Low, Sarah Rossi, Nadya Panagides, Kelly Winter, Vera Ignjatovic, Robyn Summerhayes, Alun Jones, Amanda Nouwens, Nathan Dunstan, Wayne C. Hodgson, Kenneth D. Winkel, Paul Monagle, Bryan Grieg Fry

Abstract

For over a century, venom samples from wild snakes have been collected and stored around the world. However, the quality of storage conditions for "vintage" venoms has rarely been assessed. The goal of this study was to determine whether such historical venom samples are still biochemically and pharmacologically viable for research purposes, or if new sample efforts are needed. In total, 52 samples spanning 5 genera and 13 species with regional variants of some species (e.g., 14 different populations of Notechis scutatus) were analysed by a combined proteomic and pharmacological approach to determine protein structural stability and bioactivity. When venoms were not exposed to air during storage, the proteomic results were virtually indistinguishable from that of fresh venom and bioactivity was equivalent or only slightly reduced. By contrast, a sample of Acanthophis antarcticus venom that was exposed to air (due to a loss of integrity of the rubber stopper) suffered significant degradation as evidenced by the proteomics profile. Interestingly, the neurotoxicity of this sample was nearly the same as fresh venom, indicating that degradation may have occurred in the free N- or C-terminus chains of the proteins, rather than at the tips of loops where the functional residues are located. These results suggest that these and other vintage venom collections may be of continuing value in toxin research. This is particularly important as many snake species worldwide are declining due to habitat destruction or modification. For some venoms (such as N. scutatus from Babel Island, Flinders Island, King Island and St. Francis Island) these were the first analyses ever conducted and these vintage samples may represent the only venom ever collected from these unique island forms of tiger snakes. Such vintage venoms may therefore represent the last remaining stocks of some local populations and thus are precious resources. These venoms also have significant historical value as the Oxyuranus venoms analysed include samples from the first coastal taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus) collected for antivenom production (the snake that killed the collector Kevin Budden), as well as samples from the first Oxyuranus microlepidotus specimen collected after the species' rediscovery in 1976. These results demonstrate that with proper storage techniques, venom samples can retain structural and pharmacological stability. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Proteomics of non-model organisms. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE:

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 4 5%
Professor 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Chemistry 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2015.
All research outputs
#681,357
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Proteomics
#16
of 3,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,017
of 321,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Proteomics
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.