| Title |
Probabilistic flood forecasting and decision-making: an innovative risk-based approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-012-0483-z |
| Authors |
Murray Dale, Jon Wicks, Ken Mylne, Florian Pappenberger, Stefan Laeger, Steve Taylor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 20% |
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 27 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#852
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,251
of 277,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.