| Title |
Assessment of physical vulnerability and potential losses of buildings due to shallow slides
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-014-1052-4 |
| Authors |
M. Silva, S. Pereira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#852
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,879
of 306,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.