| Title |
The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13428-017-0908-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven G. Luke, Kiel Christianson |
| Abstract |
This article presents the Provo Corpus, a corpus of eye-tracking data with accompanying predictability norms. The predictability norms for the Provo Corpus differ from those of other corpora. In addition to traditional cloze scores that estimate the predictability of the full orthographic form of each word, the Provo Corpus also includes measures of the predictability of the morpho-syntactic and semantic information for each word. This makes the Provo Corpus ideal for studying predictive processes in reading. Some analyses using these data have previously been reported elsewhere (Luke & Christianson, 2016). The Provo Corpus is available for download on the Open Science Framework, at https://osf.io/sjefs . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 21% |
| Linguistics | 16 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,620,582
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#592
of 2,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,053
of 326,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.