↓ Skip to main content

New Evidence on Hospital Profitability by Payer Group and the Effects of Payer Generosity

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Economics and Management, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
New Evidence on Hospital Profitability by Payer Group and the Effects of Payer Generosity
Published in
International Journal of Health Economics and Management, September 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:ihfe.0000036048.26098.9d
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard Friedman, Neeraj Sood, Kelly Engstrom, Diane McKenzie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Professor 2 10%
Unspecified 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Unspecified 2 10%
Linguistics 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#109
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,035
of 69,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them