You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the causal effect of smoking on hay fever and asthma: a Mendelian randomization meta-analysis in the CARTA consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-01977-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tea Skaaby, Amy E. Taylor, Rikke K. Jacobsen, Lavinia Paternoster, Betina H. Thuesen, Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia, Sofus C. Larsen, Ang Zhou, Andrew Wong, Maiken E. Gabrielsen, Johan H. Bjørngaard, Claudia Flexeder, Satu Männistö, Rebecca Hardy, Diana Kuh, Sarah J. Barry, Line Tang Møllehave, Charlotte Cerqueira, Nele Friedrich, Tobias N. Bonten, Raymond Noordam, Dennis O. Mook-Kanamori, Christian Taube, Leon E. Jessen, Alex McConnachie, Naveed Sattar, Mark N. Upton, Charles McSharry, Klaus Bønnelykke, Hans Bisgaard, Holger Schulz, Konstantin Strauch, Thomas Meitinger, Annette Peters, Harald Grallert, Ellen A. Nohr, Mika Kivimaki, Meena Kumari, Uwe Völker, Matthias Nauck, Henry Völzke, Chris Power, Elina Hyppönen, Torben Hansen, Torben Jørgensen, Oluf Pedersen, Veikko Salomaa, Niels Grarup, Arnulf Langhammer, Pål R. Romundstad, Frank Skorpen, Jaakko Kaprio, Marcus R Munafò, Allan Linneberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 11% |
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,219,424
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#49,284
of 142,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,252
of 329,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,332
of 3,823 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,823 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.