↓ Skip to main content

Case management for frail older people – a qualitative study of receivers’ and providers’ experiences of a complex intervention

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Case management for frail older people – a qualitative study of receivers’ and providers’ experiences of a complex intervention
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magnus Sandberg, Ulf Jakobsson, Patrik Midlöv, Jimmie Kristensson

Abstract

Case management interventions have been widely used in the care of frail older people. Such interventions often contain components that may act both independently of each other and interdependently, which makes them complex and challenging to evaluate. Qualitative research is needed for complex interventions to explore barriers and facilitators, and to understand the intervention's components. The objective of this study was to explore frail older people's and case managers' experiences of a complex case management intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Psychology 5 8%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2014.
All research outputs
#19,554,002
of 24,052,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,905
of 8,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,723
of 313,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#95
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,052,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.